Voters rejected Amendment 73, which would have raised money for Colorado’s public schools by increasing income, corporate and property taxes.
Great Education Colorado director and measure supporter Lisa Weil said she knew Amendment 73 would be an uphill battle.
“Adequate funding, fighting for equitable funding and making sure that every student has the opportunities they need to thrive, we know that that’s not about one day. It’s not about one election. It’s not about one year. It is a movement,” Weil said.
Amendment 73 opponents included Luke Ragland, head of the conservative education group Ready Colorado.
“I think that voters were crystal clear, and I think our message was crystal clear that simply adding more money to the same system is not the solution, that money isn’t necessarily the problem that’s facing Colorado schools,” Ragland said.
Colorado Election Results
What Was At Stake
Amendment 73 would have raised $1.6 billion for Colorado’s public schools. The measure has three prongs: an income tax hike on wealthier Coloradans, a bump in the corporate tax rate, and a change to property taxes.
- It would have changed the state’s tax structure (a 4.63 percent flat rate) to a graduated income tax for people earning more than $150,000 per year—between 5 and 8.25 percent more. The highest tax rate would have been paid by people earning $500,000 or more.
- Amendment 73 would have increased the state corporate tax rate to 6 percent (from 4.63 percent). Colorado corporations would have had to pay on average an additional $11,085 per year under the measure. The amendment would have made adjustments to property taxes.
- It would have reduced the school portion of the residential property tax assessment rate from 7.2 to 7 percent and reduced the commercial property tax assessment rate from 29 to 24 percent.
Amendment 73 began through a broad-based coalition of education advocacy groups two years ago—Colorado Rural Schools Alliance, Great Education Colorado, Colorado PTA, Arc of Colorado, NAACP, and many others—but gradually inspired thousands of parents, teachers and community members to knock on doors, man phones, text, or send postcards.
A combination of Colorado’s state tax laws, including the TABOR and Gallagher amendments, and a cumulative state budget shortfall to public schools of $7.4 billion dollars has left many schools operating at 2008 funding levels. That’s at the same time educators say student needs are higher and districts faced new academic standards, new tests and a new teacher evaluation law.
Proponents were energized by springtime rallies by teachers at the state Capitol. They pointed to Colorado’s below-average per pupil spending, low teachers’ salaries, large class sizes, and the fact that more than half of districts are on four-day weeks. While many teachers said they didn’t like politics or getting politically engaged they felt they had no choice. The spring walkouts raised public awareness about working conditions, like schools with asbestos, bathrooms without stall doors, overcrowded classes, and students with mental health needs who aren’t being helped.
Opponents argued Amendment 73 would hurt the economy and wealthy Coloradans would leave the state because they would have to pay more taxes. Groups like the Denver Metro Chamber didn’t support Amendment 73 because it said it would hurt small businesses that make more than $500,000 in income.
Other groups said they wanted to see academic goals like higher graduation rates or lower remediation rates in college spelled out in the amendment.
The committee backing the initiative raised about $1.5 million from education advocacy groups and teachers unions. Opponents raised about the same amount, mostly from a “dark money” PAC, the Colorado Economic Leadership Fund, conservative education advocacy groups, and the Americans for Prosperity-Colorado Issue Committee.
Revenues from the tax increase would go into a newly created Quality Public Education Fund. Amendment 73 specifies where a little more than half of the new revenue goes, until any legislature adopts a new public finance law. It adds new money but also makes up for money lost to schools over the past decade.
Base per pupil funding is increased from $6,769 to $7,300 per student, a 7.8 percent increase (that would bring Colorado closer to the national average in per pupil funding); funding for full day Kindergarten (right now districts get funding for a little more than half a day); special education funding increases by $120 million, gifted and talented programs by $10 million, English language proficiency programs by $20 million, and preschool programs by $10 million. The reason there are bumps in funding to those groups of students is that currently, the state only gives districts a small portion of what it costs to educate them. The increase in funding would erase the annual state budget shortfall to schools.
The rest of revenue would be divvied up between school districts. For example, Durango school district would get about $8 million more, while Denver gets about $150 million. Districts have discretion over how to spend it and many passed resolutions indicating their top priorities. Raising teachers’ salaries, more mental health supports, lowering class sizes, and restoring programs cut during the recession are among them.